Federally Guaranteed Victim Zones
|By Trevor W. Nysetvold
||September 15, 2001
Thousands are now dead and dying because of Federal airport ‘security’ policy. We have, by now, all heard the plans to enhance this security. No knives of any kind in the sterile area - even plastic ones at fast-food restaurants, according to some reports. No curbside check-in, no electronic tickets, and so forth. In other words, we will get more of the same sort of security that has proven so easy to avoid in countless tests by the Failed Aviation Administration.
All of this security is based on the idea of a sterile area, protected by a secure perimeter. The French took this idea to its logical conclusion after World War I, and created the Maginot line to defend their country. Since the 1940 fall of the Maginot line there has been no excuse for even the most ignorant and backward institution to rely primarily on perimeter defense. Then, as now, once a perimeter defense is inevitably breached, the aggressor gets a low-resistance run to the target, whether it is Paris or the cockpit.
Despite the lack of any excuse for primary reliance on this obviously futile idea, the Failed Aviation Administration has continued to rely on the Maginot doctrine. Rather than creating sterile zones, the Failed Aviation Administration has created Federally guaranteed victim zones.
The one bright light amidst the darkness of freedom-destroying enhancements to the perimeter defense idea has been the proposal to increase the number of ‘air marshals.’ By increasing the number of air marshals, once in a while there would be someone on board an airplane who was able to effectively resist something as plebian as a box-cutting knife available for $1.49 at any hardware store. These air marshals would also, presumably, be able to resist all of the other cheap, innocuous-looking weapons that will be used next time because they are not the focus of current security - clubs made from roll-on suitcase extension handles, blackjacks made from socks filled with sand, bludgeons made with pillowcases filled with soda cans, prison-style shivs, and so on, limited only by the imagination.
It is conceivable, of course, that the Failed Aviation Administration could require several air marshals on each flight, but this would be hugely expensive in highly visible real dollars, while the illusion of perimeter security is only expensive in terms of the public’s much more valuable but much less visible wasted time. Routine use of several air marshals per flight is also problematic, since it would likely lead to a sharp loss in effectiveness. The routine nature of air marshal presence would lead to easy identification, which in turn would merely make them the first victims.
Fortunately, we have in this country a significant number of individuals that could be allowed to act as air marshals whenever they happened to be flying. These individuals have passed federal background checks. As a group they are in legal trouble around 1/20th as often as Washington, DC police officers, or about 1/3 as often as New York City police officers. In an armed confrontation, this group is less than 1/5th as likely to kill an innocent person as regular police officers. They are even less likely to be wounded in an armed confrontation than police! Moreover, these individuals not only require no compensation for acting as air marshals when on airplanes, but also have paid for their own training.
These individuals are, of course, holders of the concealed handgun licenses that are currently available to all trained, non-criminal residents in 31 States. It is well past time to allow these volunteer law enforcement officers to be equipped to prevent heinous crimes, not only on airplanes, but in schools and post offices, and other federally guaranteed victim zones. It is past time to apply Article IV, section 1 of the Constitution, and require all backward States to give full faith and credit to the permits issued in States that are willing to rely on the goodness and competence of the average American.